So I’m sitting on the porch of my grandmother’s house (she’s no longer here), looking out at the lake and the rising light, a wash of soft pink and blue across the sky, the thick line of pines on the opposite shore cast purple-gray. And I’m thinking of the time my agent, who I worship and adore, told me that when she’s having a rotten day, she goes to the Museum of Modern Art and sits in the Water Lilies room until she’s all right again. In truth, it had never occurred to me that she might not be all right, at any time or for any reason; she’s very impressive and a little fierce. So I liked the idea that she would be calmed by Monet. Have you ever seen his Haystacks series? I don’t even know how many there are—many—and they chronicle the seasons and qualities of light as the day and year goes by. I have seen them in New York and Chicago and Minneapolis and St. Louis (I think)—it seems like everywhere I go there is the same haystack in the middle of the same field with the precisely captured changing season and sky. I would like to see them all in one place, and walk down a very long hall watching the light change, and trying to fathom how Monet could possibly get things so right, and wishing I could describe place so perfectly as he does.
I was writing to a painter and poet friend the other day—it makes me a little cross that he can both paint and write, and more than a little envious—about the fact that visual artists are terribly lucky to have such a tactile thing with which to make art. If I knew how to paint or draw or sketch, I think I would take terrific pleasure in being able to actually touch my materials, and in having something that guides my hand and translates what I see to what I say. There are, it seems to me, not nearly enough words with which to do this. Van Gough’s sunflowers make you want to reach out and grab them. They seem to burst from the canvas into the room. Language is less evocative, and it has to invite readers into it, rather than coming to them.
The train’s whistling by. It’s the same train whistle I’ve been listening to for nearly forty years, and the same whistle that the characters in The Center of Winter listen to as they lie awake. I’ve always wanted to know who’s on a train this early. I remember overnight train rides up the west coast, from San Francisco to Portland to see my grandmother when I was very small. And I remember middle-of-the-night treks from Minneapolis to Chicago when I was older and alone and eavesdropping on the old men arguing amicably nearby.
I think writers return and return to places, maybe a little obsessively, in their work. I don’t know why they do. I don’t know why some writers are so deeply immersed in place, and keep trying to describe the place they’re in and bring the reader into it with them and show them what it’s like and make them feel the place for themselves. I’m one of these weirdly place-centric writers. It bothers me when I can’t find myself in a place in my work; it makes me feel like I leave the reader floating in midair, unable to see or sense their surroundings, and it makes me very uneasy. So I keep coming back to places. One of them is obviously northern Minnesota, and I’m not sure why; it just absorbs me and I want to take people here. Though I’m not from here originally, I spent long spells of my childhood here, driving north on Highway 10 through cornfields and fields of sugar beet, to visit relatives who were loud and a little scary but fascinating, the same relatives who morphed into characters in my novel—and now they’re doing it again.
People ask me often if the characters in my fiction are me, or my family, or people I know. The answer is no; they are people who have taken on a life of their own, emerging mostly from names that pop into my head, names or features of people familiar to me, but who walk away from their starting point and take on form and substance totally unknown to me until they write themselves down. It’s an eerie process, and I don’t particularly like it; fiction is awfully amorphous and dictates itself according to its own interior logic. Not knowing how it will go until it goes there is a deeply unsettling process, and very uncertain, and it seems like you’re feeling around in the dark for a thing, and you don’t find it till it’s found.
So now the new novel is doing that, and I wish it wouldn’t. When I stop thinking about it and trying to push it around, it’s actually kind of neat, a discovery process that’s as much like reading someone else’s work as it is like writing your own. This is rarely possible for me; I’m hoping I’ll grow into it, and by the time I’m eighty let my books write themselves as they intend to do anyway. Anyway, the new novel has returned to this place, this very porch, with the seagulls making noise and the whistling train and the Monet light. It doesn’t stay here, of course; it goes right back to the west coast, another place that consumes me and to which my stories gravitate. And its characters are doing what characters do. I began with my grandmother’s name; she then walked off, changed eras, changed selves, became her own thing. This may ...
<< MORE >>
<< MORE >>